SCIENCE 10 Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
1st Quarter - Earth & Space (Earth Science)
2nd Quarter - Force, Motion & Energy (Physics)
3rd Quarter - Living Things and Their Environment (Biology)
4th Quarter - Matter (Chemistry)
SCIENCE 10 Curriculum Guide - DOWNLOAD HERE
Reference:
K to 12 Science Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
tSoKtOk [chalk talk] is a personal-teaching-experience blog with the ultimate goal of sharing relevant and valuable information to fellow educators
Showing posts with label teaching MATERIALS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teaching MATERIALS. Show all posts
24 October 2016
SCIENCE 9 Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
SCIENCE 9 Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
1st Quarter - Living Things and their Environment (Biology)
2nd Quarter - Matter (Chemistry)
3rd Quarter - Earth & Space (Earth Science)
4th Quarter - Force, Motion & Energy (Physics)
SCIENCE 9 Curriculum Guide - DOWNLOAD HERE
Reference:
K to 12 Science Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
1st Quarter - Living Things and their Environment (Biology)
2nd Quarter - Matter (Chemistry)
3rd Quarter - Earth & Space (Earth Science)
4th Quarter - Force, Motion & Energy (Physics)
SCIENCE 9 Curriculum Guide - DOWNLOAD HERE
Reference:
K to 12 Science Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
SCIENCE 8 Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
SCIENCE 8 Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
1st Quarter - Force, Motion & Energy (Physics)
2nd Quarter - Earth & Space (Earth Science)
3rd Quarter - Matter (Chemistry)
4th Quarter - Living Things and their Environment (Biology)
SCIENCE 8 Curriculum Guide - DOWNLOAD HERE
Reference:
K to 12 Science Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
1st Quarter - Force, Motion & Energy (Physics)
2nd Quarter - Earth & Space (Earth Science)
3rd Quarter - Matter (Chemistry)
4th Quarter - Living Things and their Environment (Biology)
SCIENCE 8 Curriculum Guide - DOWNLOAD HERE
Reference:
K to 12 Science Curriculum Guide (August 2016)
23 October 2016
How to Prepare the DLL
(As stated on DepEd Order no. 42, s.2015 Enclosure pp. 11-12 of 16)
Edited: June 10, 2017 (inclusion of Specific (Daily) Objectives after I.C. Learning Competencies/Objectives (L.C. Code)
Objectives:
Edited: June 10, 2017 (inclusion of Specific (Daily) Objectives after I.C. Learning Competencies/Objectives (L.C. Code)
| DLL Template page 1/2 |
Objectives:
This part of the DLL
includes objectives related to content knowledge and competencies. According to
Airasian (1994), lesson objectives describe the “kinds of content knowledge and
processes teachers hope their students will learn from instruction (p.48).” The
lesson objectives describe the behavior or performance teachers want learners
to exhibit in order to consider them competent. The objectives state what the
teacher intends to teach and serve as a guide for instruction and assessment.
The content standards refer to the learning area-based facts, concepts, and
procedures that students need to learn, while the competencies pertain to the
knowledge, skills, and attitudes that students need to demonstrate in a lesson.
The competency codes are also logged in this part of the DLL.
Content:
The topic or subject
matter pertains to the particular content that the lesson focuses on.
Learning Resources:
This part of the DLL
asks teachers to log the references and other learning resources that the
teacher will use for the lesson. The references include the particular pages of
the TG, LM, textbook, and the additional materials from the LRMDS portal. The
other learning resources refer to materials such as those that are
teacher-made, authentic, and others not included in the references. This part
of the DLL can also include the supplies, equipment, tools and other non-print
materials needed for activities before, during, and after the lesson.
Procedures:
This part of the DLL
contains ten (10) parts including:
a) reviewing previous lesson/s or
presenting the new lesson.
This part connects the lesson with learners’ prior knowledge. It explicitly
teaches the learners how the new lesson connects to previous lessons. It also
reviews and presents new lessons in a systematic manner;
c) presenting examples/instances
of the new shows instances of the content and competencies. This is also where the concepts are clarified;
d) discussing new concepts leads
to the first formative assessment.
Teachers shall prepare good questions for this part. The teacher will listen to
the answers of learners to gauge if they understood the lesson. If not, then
they re-teach. If the learners have understood the lesson, the teacher shall
proceed to deepening the lesson;
| DLL Template p2/2 |
e) continuation of the discussion
of new concepts leading to the second formative assessment that deepens
the lesson and shows learners new ways of applying learning. The teacher can
use pair, group, and team work to help learners discuss the lesson among
themselves. The learners can present their work to the class and this serves as
the teacher’s way of assessing if the concepts are solidifying and if their
skills are developing;
f) developing
mastery, which leads to the third formative assessment, can be done
through more individual work activities such as writing, creative ways of
representing learning, dramatizing, etc. The teacher shall ask learners to
demonstrate their learning through assessable activities such as quizzes,
worksheets, seat work, and games. When the students demonstrate learning, then
proceed to the next step. The teacher can add activities as needed until
formative assessment shows that the learners are confident in their knowledge
and competencies;
g) finding
practical applications of concepts and skills in daily living which can
develop appreciation and valuing for students’ learning by bridging the lesson
to daily living. This will also establish relevance in the lesson;
h) making
generalizations and abstractions about the lesson will conclude the
lesson by asking learners good questions that will help them crystallize their
learning so they can declare knowledge and demonstrate their skills;
i) evaluating learning is a way of assessing
the learners and whether the learning objectives have been met. Evaluation
should tap into the three types of objectives; and
j) additional activities for application or
remediation will be based on the formative assessments and will provide
children with enrichment or remedial activities. The teacher should provide
extra time for additional teaching activities to those learners demonstrating
that they have difficulties with the lesson.
Flexibility is allowed in the delivery of the DLL procedures. Teachers do not need to go through all ten (10) parts in every lesson. Teachers need to ensure that the procedures of the lesson lead to the achievement of the stated objectives. The formative assessment methods to be used by the teacher should determine if the objectives of the lesson are being met. These ten parts should be done across the week.
Remarks:
This is a part of the
DLL in which teachers shall indicate special cases including but not limited to
continuation of lesson plan to the following day in case of re-teaching or lack
of time, transfer of lesson to the following day in cases of class suspension,
etc.
Reflection:
This part of the DLL
requires teachers to reflect on and assess their effectiveness. In this part of
the DLL, the teacher should make notes on the number of learners who earned 80%
in the evaluation, the number of learners who require additional activities for
remediation and those who continue to require remediation, the effectiveness of
the remedial lesson, the teaching strategies or methods that worked well and
why, and the difficulties teachers encountered that their principal or
supervisor can help solve.
Reference:
Enclosure of DepEd Order No. 42, s.2015. Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program, pp 11-12 of 16.
DOWNLOAD A PRINTABLE TEMPLATE HERE (pdf)
DOWNLOAD A SOFT COPY TEMPLATE HERE (word file)
Reference:
Enclosure of DepEd Order No. 42, s.2015. Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program, pp 11-12 of 16.
DOWNLOAD A PRINTABLE TEMPLATE HERE (pdf)
DOWNLOAD A SOFT COPY TEMPLATE HERE (word file)
15 August 2016
Quipper School Student's Guide
A. For first time users, visit learn.quipper.com/signup
Fill in the required information like First name, Last name, Email, Username and Password.Note: Memorize your Username and Password. You will be using these info whenever you want to access the site.
Click "Create account"
Enter the Class Code that was given to you by your teacher. This will direct you to your class group.
The click "join a new class"
Click the link.
Click the Play Button and you will be directed to the Assigned Lesson. In this screenshot, the lesson is about "Parts of a Simple Circuit"
After the lesson, you may now take a short Quiz.
For correct answer, you will see a check mark.
For wrong answer, there will be an explanation provided.
B. For those who already have an account at quipper, visit learn.quipper.com
Enter your Username or email and Password.
Then click, "Log in"
Enter the Class Code that was given to you by your teacher.
Then click, "join new class".
You will be directed to your Class Group.
Quipper School (learn.quipper.com)
05 August 2013
Transmutation Table: Is it really essential?
by: J. Policarpio
What is a Transmutation Table?
According to my Professor in a Computer Class during my College Days in one prominent university in Manila where I cross-enrolled that particular subject, '...there is no such thing as Transmutation Table, even if you search the internet...'. He said this to our class more or less a decade ago. He is a foreigner.
So, what is a Transmutation Table? Here is one example of a transmutation table that I've downloaded from the internet, (it's already in the internet!)
In Philippine Education,
Transmutation Table is an essential tool for Assessment of Student's Performance wherein a particular score (called the Raw Score) of a certain student in his/her output is assigned to a Percentage Grade.
Transmuted Grade is a percentage equivalent grade assigned to a raw score which is based on a certain baseline grade corresponding to a zero raw score.
Say for example, for a 50-item test, if a student got a perfect score of 50, then his/her grade is 100. If he got 25 out of 50, then his/her grade is 80 and if he got 0 out of 50, he/she still have a grade of 70. (Refer to the table above). For this case, this grading system is said to be, base 70, since the lowest grade assigned to zero raw score is 70.
Is it the same with Percentage Grade?
Percentage Grade is a percentage equivalent grade of a certain raw score based on its total number of items.
Generally, or should I say the common way of doing this is by converting a raw score to a percentage score which can be done by simple mathematics. I think, this is the right way of doing it. So for the same 50-item test, a perfect raw score of 50 has an equivalent percentage grade of 100. But if a student got 25 out of 50, then his/her percentage grade should be 50 and it follows that if he/she got zero raw score then his/her percentage grade is also zero!
Why Use a Transmutation Table?
The passing grade is the culprit. We have a mindset that a student should have a percentage grade of 75% for him/her to pass the given output and consequently the course after the term or the School Year. If you will use the percentage grade, mostly of your students will be getting a grade below the passing mark, which is 75%. To avoid doing adjustments at the end of the term or the school year, a Transmutation Table saves the day!
Can we avoid using a Transmutation Table?
I think, yes. And that is for fairness sake. We should be impartial in giving grades and it should be supported by mathematics. While transmutation table follows certain formulas, but it is based on a certain baseline grade which I think not a good practice. If a student got a Raw Score of zero, why give him/her a percentage grade of 70? Is it more logical that his/her grade is also zero?
With Curricular Reform in Philippine Education as we embrace the K-12 Curriculum, Transmutation Table of Grades is becoming obsolete. The new curriculum prescribed base 0 grading system as well as the use of authentic assessment and the use of rubrics. (DepEd Order No 73, s2012. Enclosure 4)
Reflections
Let's try to reflect why a certain student got a failing mark in a certain output.
First, the main reason of course is he/she didn't understands the lesson. He didn't study for his/her exam.
Second, the probability that he/she didn't listen to your discussion or maybe he/she was absent during that day of discussion.
And third which I think the most important consideration is the exam itself. Is your exam valid (or undergone the process of validation)? Have you consider the level of difficulty in preparing your exam? Is it parallel to your discussion or you've just recycled it from your past test papers? Have you allotted the prescribed percentage of items per level of difficulty?
References:
Sample Image of a Transmutation Table. https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirq77c6dOvju88FxsAbpa5DSYaYxZAsc8hmOhi4J-G1hULQfLNsLIXSM9L36NQ4R6F7riQJanTwx_Tsxy8_gtc-x6hjiNxp5jEUfvO2KaeaR7lWKEMS2TlE561wXTab2GVyfjqnSG25hY/s1600/transmutation+synoptics+1.jpg
Midterm Exam Grade. http://synoptics1.blogspot.com/2010/09/midterm-exam-grades.html
DepEd Order No. 73, s2012 Enclosure No 4, pp 15-19. http://www.gov.ph/downloads/2012/09sep/20120905-DepEd-DO-0073-BSA.pdf
What is a Transmutation Table?
According to my Professor in a Computer Class during my College Days in one prominent university in Manila where I cross-enrolled that particular subject, '...there is no such thing as Transmutation Table, even if you search the internet...'. He said this to our class more or less a decade ago. He is a foreigner.
So, what is a Transmutation Table? Here is one example of a transmutation table that I've downloaded from the internet, (it's already in the internet!)
![]() |
| Transmutation Table Source: http://synoptics1.blogspot.com/2010/09/midterm-exam-grades.html |
In Philippine Education,
Transmutation Table is an essential tool for Assessment of Student's Performance wherein a particular score (called the Raw Score) of a certain student in his/her output is assigned to a Percentage Grade.
Transmuted Grade is a percentage equivalent grade assigned to a raw score which is based on a certain baseline grade corresponding to a zero raw score.
Say for example, for a 50-item test, if a student got a perfect score of 50, then his/her grade is 100. If he got 25 out of 50, then his/her grade is 80 and if he got 0 out of 50, he/she still have a grade of 70. (Refer to the table above). For this case, this grading system is said to be, base 70, since the lowest grade assigned to zero raw score is 70.
![]() |
| Transmuted vs Percentage Grade: Compared |
Percentage Grade is a percentage equivalent grade of a certain raw score based on its total number of items.
Generally, or should I say the common way of doing this is by converting a raw score to a percentage score which can be done by simple mathematics. I think, this is the right way of doing it. So for the same 50-item test, a perfect raw score of 50 has an equivalent percentage grade of 100. But if a student got 25 out of 50, then his/her percentage grade should be 50 and it follows that if he/she got zero raw score then his/her percentage grade is also zero!
Why Use a Transmutation Table?
The passing grade is the culprit. We have a mindset that a student should have a percentage grade of 75% for him/her to pass the given output and consequently the course after the term or the School Year. If you will use the percentage grade, mostly of your students will be getting a grade below the passing mark, which is 75%. To avoid doing adjustments at the end of the term or the school year, a Transmutation Table saves the day!
Can we avoid using a Transmutation Table?
I think, yes. And that is for fairness sake. We should be impartial in giving grades and it should be supported by mathematics. While transmutation table follows certain formulas, but it is based on a certain baseline grade which I think not a good practice. If a student got a Raw Score of zero, why give him/her a percentage grade of 70? Is it more logical that his/her grade is also zero?
With Curricular Reform in Philippine Education as we embrace the K-12 Curriculum, Transmutation Table of Grades is becoming obsolete. The new curriculum prescribed base 0 grading system as well as the use of authentic assessment and the use of rubrics. (DepEd Order No 73, s2012. Enclosure 4)
Reflections
Let's try to reflect why a certain student got a failing mark in a certain output.
First, the main reason of course is he/she didn't understands the lesson. He didn't study for his/her exam.
Second, the probability that he/she didn't listen to your discussion or maybe he/she was absent during that day of discussion.
And third which I think the most important consideration is the exam itself. Is your exam valid (or undergone the process of validation)? Have you consider the level of difficulty in preparing your exam? Is it parallel to your discussion or you've just recycled it from your past test papers? Have you allotted the prescribed percentage of items per level of difficulty?
References:
Sample Image of a Transmutation Table. https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirq77c6dOvju88FxsAbpa5DSYaYxZAsc8hmOhi4J-G1hULQfLNsLIXSM9L36NQ4R6F7riQJanTwx_Tsxy8_gtc-x6hjiNxp5jEUfvO2KaeaR7lWKEMS2TlE561wXTab2GVyfjqnSG25hY/s1600/transmutation+synoptics+1.jpg
Midterm Exam Grade. http://synoptics1.blogspot.com/2010/09/midterm-exam-grades.html
DepEd Order No. 73, s2012 Enclosure No 4, pp 15-19. http://www.gov.ph/downloads/2012/09sep/20120905-DepEd-DO-0073-BSA.pdf
01 July 2013
SAMPLE Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) in Physics
SIM 101: The Basic of Developing Strategic Intervention Materials for Classroom Use [Discussion about the basic details of SIM]
SIM 101: Guide in Reviewing Intervention Materials [Discussion about the CRITERIA for developing SIM]
Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM): A Closer Look [Some important pointers to remember for SIMs intended for competition]
29 April 2013
The Mind Museum: Quick Tour
As part of our course requirement last semester in ScieEd502, we have to discuss Field Trip as a teaching strategy and of course we have to experience it! After a lot of considerations (schedule, proximity, budget, and of course learnings), our class decided to have our Field Trip at The Mind Museum of Taguig City.
It was scheduled one Saturday, but since I have another subject to attend to and I badly needed to be present that day, I had my own field trip earlier than the scheduled class' field trip. This will be my first time visiting this Science Museum, and fortunately, I'm just by myself...
Here are some of the photographs of the exhibits that really captured my interest. For complete list of exhibits, refer to my references below.
![]() |
| The Mind Museum |
![]() |
| The Mind Museum |
![]() |
| The Mind Musem |
![]() |
| Robot outside the Entrance |
![]() |
| The First Automobile on Philippine Roads |
![]() |
| Robot named Aedi (it's IDEA, spelled reverse) |
![]() |
| Staan, the T. rex |
![]() |
| Air |
![]() |
| Earth |
![]() |
| Neptune |
![]() |
| The Atom |
![]() |
| Electric Table |
![]() |
| Newton's Cradle |
![]() |
| Periodic Table |
![]() |
| The Human Brain |
![]() |
| Bernoulli's Principle |
![]() |
| Evolution? |
![]() |
| Earthquake Simulator |
![]() |
| Ticket |
Operating Hours: Tuesdays - Sundays (closed on Mondays)
TIME SLOTS ARE:
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.(Saturdays only)*
*There are no Mind Movers at this time slot.
References:
The Mind Museum Website - themindmuseum.org
List of Complete Exhibits - ourawesomeplanet.com/awesome/2012/03/mind-museum-at-taguig-guide.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


























